Choose Parrocchettami if...
- You have interviews, voice notes, lessons, or recordings to transcribe.
- You want to work without an account or uploads.
- You need plain text, timestamps, or SRT subtitles.
Dedicated comparison
Parrocchettami vs FluidVoice.
Two local apps, but with different workflows: transcribe an audio file or dictate directly where you are writing.
The difference in one line
Parrocchettami starts with an audio file or a ready recording. FluidVoice is designed for speaking and making text appear directly in other apps.
Quick comparison
| Feature | Parrocchettami | FluidVoice |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Audio transcription | Dictation and voice typing |
| Existing recordings | ✅ Yes | Not the main workflow |
| Text in other apps | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
| Works offline | ✅ Yes, after downloading the model | ✅ Local models available |
| Open source | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Export | TXT, timestamps, and SRT | Text inserted into your workflow |
Which should you choose?
Choose FluidVoice if...
- You want to speak while writing in Slack, Notion, an editor, or other apps.
- You want a shortcut for starting dictation quickly.
- You want voice typing that works like a keyboard input.
In short
FluidVoice is probably better for dictating on the go. Parrocchettami is simpler when you start with audio and want a transcript to review, edit, or export.
Discover FluidVoice on GitHub or download Parrocchettami.